Young Muslims of Australia Forum Forum Index Young Muslims of Australia Forum
YMA is an Australia wide youth organisation, dedicated to learning and living the Islamic way of life here in our beautiful country of Australia. We aim to be people of benefit, not only towards ourselves, but to all of creation.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Hague court could try Bush, Blair

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Young Muslims of Australia Forum Forum Index -> What's the latest in the media?
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:57 pm    Post subject: Hague court could try Bush, Blair Reply with quote

Hague court could try Bush, Blair
By Gethin Chamberlain, LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
Published March 18, 2007


The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court said in an interview that he can envision a scenario in which President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair could one day face war-crimes charges at The Hague.
Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo said in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph that it was frustrating that the court was viewed in the Arab world as biased in favor of the West.
Asked whether he could envision a situation in which Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair found themselves in the dock answering charges of war crimes in Iraq, he replied:
"Of course, that could be a possibility ... whatever country joins the court can know that whoever commits a crime in their country could be prosecuted by me."

The U.S. has refused to accept the court's jurisdiction and for years opposed the court, fearing that it would be used as a political tool to target American soldiers and diplomats overseas.

Human rights lawyers remain skeptical about whether charges against either leader would ever gain credibility in the court.
Some Muslim countries have criticized what they claim is the court's reluctance to address offenses committed by Western governments.

Sudan, which has been investigated over its role in the mass killing of civilians in its western region of Darfur, has called for the court to investigate coalition actions in Iraq.

Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia's former prime minister, has announced plans to set up an alternative war-crimes tribunal to hear complaints against countries including Britain, Israel and the United States.

Mr. Moreno-Ocampo said that, while he was sympathetic to the views of Arab countries, the answer was for them to get involved in the legal process.

The court is restricted in what it can investigate. The U.N . Security Council can ask it to act -- as in the case of Darfur -- or the court can launch an investigation if it receives a complaint from a state that is party to the Rome agreement that established it.

The U.S . is not a signatory, although lately it has begun supporting court investigations in several African civil wars, including the conflict in Sudan.

The court can also look into purported offenses carried out by, or on the territory of, a party to the agreement.

Afghanistan is a signatory, though Sudan is not. Days before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, then-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein approached lawyers in Britain about signing up, but his effort was overtaken by events. Had he succeeded, the actions of the U.S. in Iraq would fall within the court's jurisdiction.

Mr. Moreno-Ocampo said it was still possible for an investigation to be launched into coalition actions in Iraq if that country signed up.

Hamid al-Bayati, Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations, said Iraq was actively considering joining.

The court is currently prosecuting cases against the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda, a militia leader in the Democratic Republic of Congo and a number of individuals believed to have been involved in the conflict in Darfur.


============ ========= ==

Court 'can envisage' Blair prosecution
By Gethin Chamberlain, Sunday Telegraph

17/03/2007

http://washingtontimes.com/world/20070318-121749-6686r.htm


Tony Blair faces the prospect of an International Criminal Court investigation for alleged coalition war crimes in Iraq.

The court's chief prosecutor told The Sunday Telegraph that he would be willing to launch an inquiry and could envisage a scenario in which the Prime Minister and American President George W Bush could one day face charges at The Hague.

Luis Moreno-Ocampo urged Arab countries, particularly Iraq, to sign up to the court to enable allegations against the West to be pursued. Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations said that his country was actively considering signing up.

America has refused to accept the court's jurisdiction and is unlikely to hand over any of its citizens to face trial. However, Britain has signed up and the Government has indicated its willingness to tackle accusations of war crimes against a number of British soldiers.

Mr Moreno-Ocampo said it was frustrating that the court was viewed in the Arab world as biased in favour of the West. Asked whether he could envisage a situation in which Mr Blair and Mr Bush found themselves in the dock answering charges of war crimes in Iraq, he replied: "Of course, that could be a possibility\ u2026 whatever country joins the court can know that whoever commits a crime in their country could be prosecuted by me."

Human rights lawyers remain sceptical about whether charges will ever be brought.

Some Muslim countries have criticised what they claim is the court's reluctance to address offences committed by western governments.

Sudan, which has been investigated over its role in the killing of civilians in Darfur, has called for the court to investigate coalition actions in Iraq, while Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia's former prime minister, has announced plans to set up an alternative war crimes tribunal to hear complaints against countries including Britain, Israel and America.

Mr Moreno-Ocampo said that, while he was sympathetic to the views of Arab countries, the answer was for them to get involved in the legal process.

The court is restricted in what it can investigate. The UN Security Council can ask it to act - as in the case of Darfur - or the court can launch an investigation if it receives a complaint from a state which is party to the Rome agreement that established it. It can also look into alleged offences carried out by, or on the territory of, a party to the agreement.

Jordan has signed up and Afghanistan is a signatory, though Sudan is not. Days before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Saddam Hussein approached lawyers in Britain about signing up but was overtaken by events. Had he succeeded, the actions of the US in Iraq would fall within the court's jurisdiction.

Mr Moreno-Ocampo said it was still possible for an investigation to be launched into coalition actions in Iraq if that country signed up.

Hamid al-Bayati, Iraq's ambassador to the UN, said Iraq was actively considering joining.

The court is currently prosecuting cases against the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda, a militia leader in the Democratic Republic of Congo and a number of individuals believed to have been involved in the conflict in Darfur.

Copyright © 2007 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.

_________________
"Except the one who comes to Allah with a sound heart"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Young Muslims of Australia Forum Forum Index -> What's the latest in the media? All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Car Credit